Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Sension

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Sension

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable. I highly doubt that he was only person in the 1600's that was secretly gay. JDDJS (talk) 22:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article is likely in need of some WP:TNT, but it does appear that Mr. Sension has been the subject of a fair bit of scholarship. See, e.g., this article, this article, and this article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 04:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further review of the available sources and the current state of the article, I am going to formally vote for deletion. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 23:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 05:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 05:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is based on 3 modern, scholarly articles all of which draw their evidence from transcripts of the trial of Nicholas Sension for sodomy in 1677. Now if Arthur Miller were to write a play about Sensions, I could see the notability. But 3 scholarly articles do not notability create. Perhaps there is an appropriate merge target?E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. It can be reworked and merged to History of gay men in the United States, which can be good, since that article lack in any information about colonial times. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Can't see how it has enough referencing to pass WP:GNG, but merging it per Arthistorian's suggestion would be okay as well. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.